"[A] delightfully named blog", (Sewell Chan, New York Times). "[R]elentlessly eclectic", (Gary, Iowa City). Taxing your attention span since 2005.
Tuesday, March 10, 2009
Cross-currents on the Brooklyn Bridge
This morning, on the return leg of my Brooklyn Bridge walk, I encountered this group heading from Brooklyn towards Manhattan. As I passed them, a man handed me a leaflet explaining that they are members of the Nipponzan Myohoji Buddhist Order, walking from Leverett, Massachusetts to Washington, D.C. to advocate "Abolition of Nuclear Weapons; Renunciation of War; Conversion from War to Peace Economy." Admirable goals, all.
Also on the Bridge this morning, going in the opposite direction, were groups of people, many decked out in colorful Tibetan dress, some waving Tibetan flags, and some wearing headbands that said "Free Tibet". When I got back to the Brooklyn side, I found them massing in Cadman Plaza Park for a demonstration.
I wondered if the Tibetans and their fellow Buddhists from Leverett had greeted each other as they passed on the Bridge. I'm sure the Tibetans want to get their freedom by peaceful means. Given the stark parameters of their situation, their only non-suicidal option may be moral suasion. But, in some circumstances, might it be necessary to choose between the ideals of peace and freedom? In the back of my mind, I was hearing the words of Patrick Henry.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Very nice!
ReplyDeleteLove the justoposition of the two Buddhist groups meeting on the bridge.
I am speaking as a former pacifist -- one who is still highly sympathetic to those ideals but who can no longer call himself a pacifist for pretty much the reasons cited.
Agreed. Sometimes (many times) the cost of peace is too high.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately, very few world leaders possess the wisdom needed to wield their tremendous power judiciously.